CSBS encourages the CFPB to recognize that state regulators, through their licensing and supervisory authority, serve as the primary regulators of non-depository financial services providers.
State regulators acknowledge the CFPB’s willingness to review and seek public input on the Bureau’s Rulemaking Processes. State regulators, through CSBS, have engaged with the Bureau through the public comment process on many of the Bureau’s proposed rules.
In light of the significant implications for financial stability and the resiliency of the U.S. banking industry, state bank regulators believe it is important that agreement across all of the federal banking agencies should be reached before any proposed revisions to the eSLR are issued or adopted.
July 18, 2018 Monica Jackson, Office of the Executive Secretary onsumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street, NW Washington, DC Docket No. CFPB-2018-00014 Re: Request for Information Regarding the Bureau’s Consumer Complaint and Consumer Inquiry Handling Processes Dear Ms. Jackson, The Conference of State Bank Supervisors (“CSBS” or “state regulators”) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Consumer Financial Protection
On behalf of the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS), I am writing to express our members’ strong support for your legislation, H.R. 3626, the Bank Service Company Examination Coordination Act.
The Honorable Jeb Hensarling Chairman House Financial Services Committee 2129 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Dear Chairman Hensarling: On behalf of the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) 1, I am writing to express state regulators’ opposition to H.R. 6743, the “Consumer Information Notification Requirement Act.” This bill would preempt state data breach notification laws and undermine state
The Honorable Jeb Hensarling Chairman House Committee on Financial Services United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Chairman Hensarling: On behalf of the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS), 1 I am writing to express state regulators’ opposition to provisions in Section 7 of the “Federal Reserve Reform Act of 2018” (H.R. 6741) that would impose a tax